Grade AGreen Leaf Kitchen
Bengaluru, Karnataka
“Exceptional kitchen discipline, clear records and consistently strong hygiene practices.”
9.2/10 audit score94% trust
Two-stage verified audits
What the venue claims. What the inspector found. Both published.
Owners record video evidence and rate themselves. An independent auditor then scores the same venue without ever seeing those ratings. The gap between the two becomes a public trust score.
Audited near you
Places that passed, city first
Approved venues in your selected city appear first. Explore trusted places farther away as you continue.
Preview venues — sample data until approved audits are featured
Grade A4.9
Grade AHarbour Table
Mumbai, Maharashtra
“A spotless service area backed by excellent food-storage and staff-hygiene controls.”
8.9/10 audit score91% trust
Grade AAmber Courtyard Hotel
Jaipur, Rajasthan
“Guest rooms, linen handling and shared spaces showed careful daily oversight.”
8.7/10 audit score90% trust
Grade A+Backwater Haven
Kochi, Kerala
“Outstanding room sanitation and an impressively transparent evidence submission.”
9.4/10 audit score96% trust
Watch first
The whole system in sixty seconds
Owner films the evidence. The state verifies it. An independent auditor scores the venue blind. Both scores go public.
Why this exists
Every self-declared rating has the same problem: no one checks.
Review stars measure ambience. Inspection reports sit in filing cabinets. A venue can claim five-star hygiene with a dirty kitchen and pay no price for the gap. FScertify Audit closes that gap with a simple, brutal mechanism: the owner makes a claim, an auditor who never saw that claim tests it, and both numbers go public side by side.
Honest venues earn a verifiable, permanent trust record.
Inflated claims are caught by the alignment engine and flagged for investigation.
Auditors who rubber-stamp are detected by their own alignment patterns.
Owner claim vs blind audit, category by category (illustrative)
Kitchen hygiene9.5 / 7.0
Food storage7.5 / 7.0
Staff hygiene9.5 / 4.0
Waste management5.5 / 6.0
Documentation7.5 / 8.0
Owner claim Blind audit Gap = trust score
Scope
One framework. Two industries. Sixteen categories of scrutiny.
Every venue is graded against a fixed, public checklist — weighted categories broken into yes/no checkpoints, so a score of 7.5 means the same thing everywhere.
Restaurants
8 categories- 1Kitchen hygiene
- 2Food storage & temperature
- 3Staff hygiene & training
- 4Pest control
- 5Waste management
- 6Dining area cleanliness
- 7Water quality
- 8Documentation & licences
Hotels
8 categories- 1Room cleanliness
- 2Bathroom sanitation
- 3Linen & laundry
- 4Kitchen & F&B
- 5Common areas
- 6Pool & recreation
- 7Staff hygiene
- 8Safety & compliance
Video-verified
GPS + timestamp on every clip
Blind by design
Auditors never see owner claims
Anti-corruption
Auditor patterns monitored
Method
Four steps from claim to public verdict
Stage 1
Owner self-assessment
The owner records a GPS-tagged, timestamped video for each category, rates their own performance honestly, and certifies the submission under penalty of delisting.
- Video evidence per category
- Self-rating with confidence score
- Certified declaration
State desk
Government verification
The state admin desk reviews every video clip and approves the submission. Only then is an independent auditor assigned — with a deadline.
- Every clip reviewed
- Approval gates auditor assignment
- Venue approval is a separate decision
Stage 2
Blind independent audit
The auditor sees the venue and the checkpoint list — never the owner's ratings. Each checkpoint is scored yes/no and evidence photos are captured on-site.
- Owner ratings fully hidden
- Checkpoint-level scoring
- Photo evidence required
Alignment
The trust score
Both scores are compared category by category. Small gaps build trust. Large gaps trigger an investigation — and everything is published for the public to see.
- Category-by-category gap analysis
- Low alignment = automatic flag
- Both scores always public
How a venue's grade is computed
Checkpoints
Yes/no items per category, scored 0–10
Two stages
Owner score + auditor score, averaged
Alignment
% of categories within 1.5 points
Final grade
Published with both scores & trust score
Alignment below 70% triggers automatic investigation. Auditor alignment patterns are tracked across every audit they ever perform.
Why it matters
What changes when honesty becomes measurable
Ends information asymmetry
Today a diner knows nothing about the kitchen behind the wall. FScertify makes hygiene a public, comparable number — like a credit score for cleanliness.
Rewards honest businesses
Clean venues currently subsidise dirty ones by competing blind. Published trust scores let hygiene become a marketing asset, not a hidden cost.
Scales public-health inspection
No government can inspect every venue every month. Owner evidence plus targeted blind audits multiplies inspector coverage without multiplying headcount.
A model any region can adopt
The two-stage method — self-claim, blind verification, published gap — works for restaurants, hotels, schools, hospitals, anywhere trust must be proven.
Own a venue? Put your claim on record.
Register, submit your evidence, and let a blind audit prove you right.
Get started
Tell us about your venue and our team will contact you to set up your account and your first evidence submission.
Verified venues
0 venues listed
No venues match your search yet — the first verified venues will appear here as audits complete.